Despite the fact that O’Donnell laudably tried using to focus the audience’s consideration onand hopefully final, Charlie Sheen trainwreck interview, courtesy of the tragic undertow that threatens to pull Sheen under for wonderful, I was overtaken, not through the pulling around the thread, and therefore the voracious audience he serves. It did not make me depressing, it developed me angry.
Regarding celebrities, we can be a heartless country, basking within their misfortunes like nude sunbathers at Schadenfreude Seashore. The impulse is understandable, to some degree. It can be grating to pay attention to complaints from most people who get pleasure from privileges that most of us can not even contemplate. In the event you can’t muster up some compassion for Charlie Sheen, who helps make far more cash for any day’s function than many of us will make in a decade’s time, I guess I can’t blame you.
With all the quick pace of occasions on the web and therefore the specifics revolution sparked by the World-wide-web, it is incredibly simple for your technological innovation trade to believe it’s exceptional: continually breaking new ground and doing facts that no person has ever executed previously.
But you can find other kinds of corporation that have already undergone a lot of the same exact radical shifts, and also have just as outstanding a stake with the foreseeable future.
Get healthcare, for example.
We generally think of it as a tremendous, lumbering beast, but in reality, medication has undergone a series of revolutions inside past 200 years that happen to be at the very least equal to individuals we see in technological know-how and advice.
Significantly less understandable, but nonetheless inside the norms of human nature, will be the impulse to rubberneck, to slow down and look at the carnage of Charlie spectacle of Sheen’s unraveling, but of your blithe interviewer Sheen’s lifestyle as we pass it with the most suitable lane of our each day lives. To get truthful, it may possibly be hard for people to discern the variation in between a run-of-the-mill attention whore, and an honest-to-goodness, circling the drain tragedy-to-be. On its personal merits, a quote like “I Am On a Drug. It’s Labeled as Charlie Sheen” is sheer genius, and we can’t all be anticipated to take the total measure of someone’s everyday living just about every time we listen to a thing humorous.
Rapid forward to 2011 and I am attempting to look into means that of being a little more business-like about my hobbies (typically songs). By the stop of January I had manned up and started to promote my blogs. I had developed many diverse blogs, which have been contributed to by good friends and colleagues. I promoted these activities as a result of Facebook and Twitter.
2nd: the little abomination that the Gang of 5 about the Supream Court gave us a year or so back (Citizens Inebriated) literally has just a little bouncing betty of its individual that can extremely effectively go off from the faces of Govs Wanker, Sacitch, Krysty, and J.O. Daniels. As this ruling prolonged the principle of “personhood” to each businesses and unions, to try to deny them any right to operate in the legal framework that they were organized under deprives these “persons” on the freedoms of speech, association and motion. Which implies (the moment once again, quoting law college trained family members) that either the courts ought to uphold these rights for your unions (as person “persons” as assured by the Federal (and most state) constitutions, or they have to declare that these attempts at stripping or limiting union rights ought to utilize to primary companies, also.
On Monday night, I watched my first, and hopefully last, Charlie Sheen trainwreck interview, courtesy of The Last Word host Lawrence O’Donnell. While O’Donnell laudably tried to focus the audience’s attention on the tragic undertow that threatens to pull Sheen under for good, I was overtaken, not by the spectacle of Sheen’s unraveling, but of the blithe interviewer pulling on the thread, and the voracious audience he serves. It didn’t make me sad, it made me angry.
When it comes to celebrities, we can be a heartless country, basking in their misfortunes like nude sunbathers at Schadenfreude Beach. The impulse is understandable, to some degree. It can be grating to listen to complaints from people who enjoy privileges that most of us can’t even imagine. If you can’t muster up some compassion for Charlie Sheen, who makes more money for a day’s work than most of us will make in a decade’s time, I guess I can’t blame you.
Less understandable, but still within the norms of human nature, is the impulse to rubberneck, to slow down and check out the carnage of Charlie Sheen’s life as we pass it in the right lane of our everyday lives. To be honest, it can be tough for people to discern the difference between a run-of-the-mill attention whore, and an honest-to-goodness, circling the drain tragedy-to-be. On its own merits, a quote like “I Am On A Drug. It’s Called Charlie Sheen” is sheer genius, and we can’t all be expected to take the full measure of someone’s life every time we hear something funny.
But the people who are inviting Charlie Sheen to star in his own slo-mo snuff film don’t get a pass, and at a certain point, neither does their audience. It should be clear, to anyone who’s paying attention, that Charlie Sheen is in serious trouble, and that his next big exclusive could very well be with the LA County coroner. I disagree with Mediaite Managing Editor Colby Hall that interviewers like Piers Morgan are enabling Sheen, or even exploiting him. They’re not just pointing at Charlie Sheen’s self-immolation, they are throwing gasoline on it, and with Sheen’s distress as obvious as it is, making accomplices of the audience.
As it happens, I really like Charlie Sheen. I know it’s fashionable to snark about his TV show, but Sheen really is a gifted actor, and for those of you who think he owes his success to his famous father, I have two words for you, and one of them is “Emilio.” I don’t know if any man really deserves the kind of money that Sheen makes, but then again, if I had a nickel for every gag I laughed out loud at through two Hot Shots movies, I’d have a big-ass pile of nickels.
But even if you don’t care for Sheen, or you’re one of those people who can’t muster compassion for addicts who “bring things on themselves,” doesn’t decency at least dictate that you not make things worse?
Lawrence O’Donnell speaks knowingly about the trouble that Charlie Sheen is in, and with regard to Sheen’s current trajectory, he’s right, it is sad. But the interview he uses to illustrate that downward spiral is much more a symptom of our own sickness than Sheen’s: (from MSNBC)
Follow us on Twitter.
Sign up for Mediaite’s daily newsletter.
Each day, Inc.'s reporters scour the Web for the most important and interesting news to entrepreneurs. Here's what we found today:
Twitter's sky-high valuation. Is the microblogging start-up really worth $10 billion? The eye-popping figure is being bandied about in Silicon Valley, according to The Wall Street Journal, which reports that both Google and Facebook have engaged in "low-level talks" recently to snap up Twitter. Could such rich valuations—Facebook at $50 billion, Groupon at $6 billion and the Huffington Post at $315 million—lead to another tech bubble? A warning from Ethan Kurzweil of Bessemer Venture Partners: "Are these prices justifiable based on financial multiples? No."
Turning your site into a profit center. Ben Lerer, founder of Thrillist.com and Inc. TV veteran, knows a thing or two about making money off of digital content. After all, Thrillist has millions of subscribers, a devoted following, and, following the recent acquisition of JackThreads.com, a bona-fide commerce arm. In a recent post for OPEN Forum, Lerer discusses the need to monetize your site, even if that means going outside your traditional business model. "In the future, the smartest content companies are going to find ways to leverage their big audience to make money in commerce," Lerer writes. "What those guys would be well-served to think about is how best to otherwise monetize the audience they have, and I don't think selling content on the iPad is the answer." The same theory can be applied to commerce companies, that is, building legitimate content to keep audiences interested, Lerer says.
Unemployment reaches lowest levels in three years. Even with severe weather and snowstorms causing temporary layoffs over the last month, unemployment levels continue to steadily decrease. The New York Times reports unemployment applications sunk to their lowest point since July 2008. Unemployment applications currently stand at about 383,000, significantly lower than the recession's low point in March 2009, when applications peaked at 651,000. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, unemployment applications are a good barometer of companies' willingness to hire, but applications would need to sit consistently below 375,000 to indicate a significant decline in the unemployment rate. Nearly 14 million people remain out of work, and 9.4 million people continue to receive unemployment aid.
Maybe the clothes do make the business woman. Months ago, the media had a field day after Swiss Bank UBS AG crafted a detailed 43-page employee code instructing staff members on how to "dress to impress." Now, Harvard Business Review reports that the Center for Work-Life Policy has produced new research showing that the Swiss bank wasn't too far off by suggesting a dress code for women. After surveying over a thousand males and females working in corporate America, more than half of the women agreed that not only does a woman in a high position need to dress conservatively, but that clothing and success go hand-in-hand. The question is who's responsible for providing business women with "constructive feedback" on what to wear and how to wear it. Perhaps their male colleagues? Yeah, right.
From penalty box to corporate suite. It's an unspoken truth: professional athlete entrepreneurs are usually just glorified spokespeople. But today's OPEN Forum has the story of Zenon Konopka, a center for the New York Islanders, who, according to the story, is as passionate about his two businesses, Prime Wine Products and Pure Press Oil, as he is about hockey. As one colleague tells OPEN Forum, "He calls before his pregame naps to talk business, and he texts me at two in the morning with ideas. If he didn't put money in, I would have paid him to be a part of this." Konopka first learned about business as a kid growing up in Ontario, selling produce at a local market, and later, buying a local pub with his family. Now, Konopka is hoping to keep the tradition of running a family business alive. He tells OPEN Forum, "I want to build a business big enough and profitable enough that I have the luxury to have my friends and family involved in the business, working in the business, and able to grow with the business."
BBC's unnoffical archivist. In a effort save money, the BBC announced a couple of months ago that it has plans to cut 172 websites. But fear not. An anonymous good samaritan has taken the time to archive the doomed sites in a BitTorrent file for public access. The cost for copying, archiving, and redistributing the online content from all 172 websites? A mere $3.99. "The purpose of this project is to show how the entire 172 public facing websites that are earmarked for deletion have been copied, archived, distributed and republished online - independently - for the price of a cup of Starbucks coffee," according to the anonymous archivist.
More from Inc.magazine:
Get this delivered to your inbox.
Follow us on Twitter.
Follow us on Tumblr.
Like us on Facebook.
Source: http://removeripoffreports.net/ online reputation management
The ultimate in repairing a bruised reputation for business
No comments:
Post a Comment